Find A Foreclosure:
Search all the top sites with one click!NOTE: This bill has not passed and the program is NOT yet available.
Background
This bill was first introduced and sponsored by Senator Richard Durbin [Democrat - Illinois] in the fall of 2007, when experts estimated that nearly 2 million homeowners were at risk of losing their homes to foreclosure. Today nearly 8.1 million homeowners -- nearly 16% of all homeowners are at risk of foreclosure.
Since the bill was first introduced, Durbin's has held three hearings on his bill and tried on three occasions to pass it, each time facing opposition from mortgage bankers and Republicans. It appears the tide may have turned for Senator Durbin, as the bill is gathering momentum. As of January 2009, the bill has the support of President Barack Obama and 13 Democratic Senators including Senaotrs Boxer, Biden, Kerry, Schumer, Dodd, Harkin, Clinton, Obama and Feinstein. In addition, banking giant Citigroup has endorsed the bill -- though no other major bank to date has.
Sentor Durbin's bill is intended to help millions of at-risk homeowners prevent foreclosures by allowing them to modify the terms of their mortgages in bankruptcy proceedings.
Problem: Loan Modifications Have Mostly Been a Failure
- Recent voluntary efforts to modify mortgages have failed woefully. According to a recently-published study, almost half of the most recent so-called foreclosure prevention efforts actually increased the monthly payments of homeowners -- with most ending up in default again within 6 months.
- With housing prices falling, homeowners facing foreclosure are unable to get out from under an unaffordable mortgage by selling.
- The huge volume of foreclosures is further driving home prices down -- fueled by lenders looking to cut their losses by dumping repossesed homes on the market.
Solution: Tax-Free Mortgage "Cramdowns"
Bankruptcy modifications, commonly known as "cramdowns" is at the heart of Durbin's bill. Today, virtually every type of personal debt, including multifamily homes, vacation homes, investment properties and family farms, can be restructured in bankruptcy with the exception of the secured debt on mortgages of primary single-famly residence. This exception dates to the 1970's, when most mortgages were fixed rate, long term agreements between local bankers and their neighborhood customers. The mortgage market has changed considerably since the 1970's, and mortgages on primary residences are often now the primary cause of financial distress.
Durbin's bill would help the bankruptcy code catch up with these changes in the mortgage market. The bill would help the bankruptcy code catch up with these changes in the mortgage market and end the exception. By making the changes the idea is that you'd now have an effective way to keep struggling homeowners in their houses.
The bill would cost taxpayers nothing and would hep families save their homes by:
- Eliminating a provision of the bankruptcy law that prohibits modifications to mortgage loans on a debtor's principal residence, so that primary mortgages are treated the same as vacation homes and family farms.
- Extending the time frame debtors are allowed for repayment, in order to reduce monthly payments to make the mortgage more affordable.
- Permitting bankruptcy judges to replace escalating variable interest rates with a new interest rate that will keep the mortgage affordable over the long term while also compensating creditors appropriately for risk.
- Waiving the bankruptcy counseling requirement for families for whom foreclosure will soon commence, so that precious time is not lost as families fight to save their homes.
- Ensuring lenders provide proper notice when assessing fees and allow judges to waive prepayment penalties.
- Maintaining debtors' legal claims against predatory lenders while in bankruptcy.
Opposition: Why Some Oppose the Bill
Several large trade groups including the Financial Services Roundtable, Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association, American Securitization Forum, mortgage bankers, and many Republicans are opposed to the plan.
Opponents to the bill cite the following reasons:
- Protecting the sanctity of contracts.
- Homeowners will seek bankruptcy even when they are able to pay off mortgages over time.
- Drive up borrowing costs for all as lenders work into their calculations any losses they might anticipate by the decision of a bankruptcy judge.
- Banks and mortgage companies want the exclusive right to renegotiate mortgage terms or foreclose.
Senators Durbin, Dodd and Schumer, Citigroup annouce agreement
CBO: Turmoil in housing markets taking toll on federal budget; Fannie, Freddie now under government conservatorship; Analysis by Kevin Hassett of American Enterprise Institute; Analysis by Adam Posen of Peterson Institute
Post new comment